Re: because we fiddl on the libraries

[Karl Reinl <karl.reinl@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Am Dienstag, dem 23.06.2026 um 10:42 +0200 schrieb Benoît Minisini:
> Le 22/06/2026 à 23:51, Karl Reinl a écrit :
> > Am Montag, dem 22.06.2026 um 23:22 +0200 schrieb Benoît Minisini:
> > > Le 22/06/2026 à 22:29, Karl Reinl a écrit :
> > > > Salut Benoît,
> > > > 
> > > > because we fiddl on the libraries, in properties
> > > > 
> > > > with vendor filled I find it in
> > > > ~/.local/share/gambas3/lib/ratatum/isItALib:0.0.gambas
> > > > 
> > > > with an empty vendor I  find it in but the Version-Part ist
> > > > wrong
> > > > ~/.local/share/gambas3/lib/(unknown)/isItALib:0.0-0.0.gambas
> > > 
> > > I don't understand what you mean. Why do you say it's wrong?
> > > 
> > 
> > Both cases are from the same project; the only difference is that
> > in
> > one case I specified the vendor.
> > 
> > And then the library name changed; it now has 4 * 0 in the ver
> > 
> > 
> 
> The library file name has just changed, in relation with issue 2109
> in 
> the bugtracker.
> 
> Now it includes both the version and the maximum version as defined
> in 
> the 'Compatible until' field of the 'information' tab of the project 
> property dialog. But only the major and the minor version.
> 
> I guess your library versions looks like "0.0.X".
> 
> Regards,
> 
Oh, so I was lucky enough to test two versions°-) . Now it works again
and gives two identical results. Thanks

Charlie