Re: Aw: Re: Important change in MaskBox control

[Benoît Minisini <benoit.minisini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Le 16/04/2026 à 15:17, Florian Brunke a écrit :
> Hi,
> okay I will clarify this by something you can all test:
> 1- Use the following mask definition in a MaskBox: "!00:00"
> 2- now enter "12:34" into the MaskBox; you will see, every position will 
> be OVERWRITTEN
> 3- next, put the cursor to the most leftposition again and try typing in 
> new digits; you will see nothing happens, because the positions are not 
> overwritten again.
> 4- now delete the whole MaskBox and insert: "11:05"
> 5- put the cursor just right of the ":" separator
> 6- type "12"; you see that theyou can insert the "1" by OVERWRITING but 
> not the "2" (confronted by anything but "0", overwriting is blocked)
> 7- the same happens, resp. again nothing happens, if you put the cursor 
> in the most left position
> 8- finally something special to demonstrate: delete the MaskBox contents 
> again and insert "10:20"
> 9- now you will see that you can insert and OVERWRITE the segments 
> before and after the ":" separator. So, apparently, if the right 
> position of the segment is a "0", overwriting works.
> In this kind of mask I think digits should generally be overwritten in 
> any position.
> Best regards,
> Florian

My bad, it was just a bug that prevented any insertion in a full slot 
between two separators. It does make sense only in insertion mode.

It's fixed in master.

--
Benoît Minisini.