Re: Looping through an array with FOR EACH

[Gianluigi <gradobag@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Il 17/01/26 14:48, Benoît Minisini ha scritto:
> No. As I explaines, the order comes from a specific feature added to the 
> hash table. This feature is not mandatory for a hash table to be a hash 
> table. I added it because it allows to use the hash table both as a hash 
> table and a rudimentory ordered list. But it has a cost: 16 bytes by 
> element!

Hi Benoit,

I apologize, but as I told Jussi, I'm working on another job and I 
didn't explain myself well.
Let me put it this way: if someone asks me if the Gambas3 collections 
are in order and I say yes, am I wrong?
I'm ignorant, I haven't studied math, and I don't know hash tables, so I 
can't talk about them.
Sorry if I'm a pain in the ass with my nonsense.

And if you're tired of answering, I understand you very well 😇

Regards
Gianluigi