Re: Hmm... 30.20.2 dropped backward compatibility?

[Admin <admin@xxxxxxxxxx>]

13.10.2025 19:36, Benoît Minisini пишет:
> Le 13/10/2025 à 14:11, Admin a écrit :
> > Greetings!
> >
> > I think I've missed something. Maybe this was already discussed, but 
> > in Debian 13 if I install Gambas from an official repo by `apt 
> > install gambas3`, I get 3.20.2-1 version, and it does not run any 
> > binaries, giving me [gb.gui.base]._Gui._InitApp.180: #2: Cannot load 
> > class 'FMain': File or directory does not exist.
> >
> > That's not a repo problem, building 3.20.2 from sources gives the 
> > same result. Actually building any version starting from 3.20.2 gives 
> > the same result.
> >
> > My binaries only work if my gambas-runtime is older then 3.20.1-2.
> >
> > Did we drop some backward compatibility while I was not watching? :-)
> >
> > Dmitry.
>
> No. You should even not get this error, as at '_Gui._InitApp.180', 
> just an error message is displayed on the error output. No error is 
> raised.
>
> I suggest you try the repositories from OpenSuSE Build Server to see 
> if you have a correct behaviour.
>
> https://gambaswiki.org/wiki/doc/packages
>
> Regards,
I tried that. Indeed OpenSuSE version 3.20.99 worked. But what about 
official repos? Well, I fixed the problem by specifying the exact 
bytecode, in my case - 3.15, those binaries work with official debian 
repo version 3.20.2-1. Since reinstalling Gambas on all Debian13 
machines is not really a sutable way, this fix is good enough. I just 
wonder If this is intentional and if it will change in the future.


Dmitry