Re: Need Help with defining highlight definition

[Brian G <brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 7/15/25 12:19, Benoît Minisini wrote:
> Le 15/07/2025 à 17:49, Brian G a écrit :
> > I don't know if this is useful to anyone else but I extended the 
> > texthighlighter with a static TextHighlighter.IgnoreCase property
> >
> > Which will allow caseless word and symbol matches. Is it worth asking 
> > Ben to add this feature to the master?
> >
> > Anyone else have this issue?
> >
> > Usage is like:
> >
> > .......
> >
> >    TextHighlighter.IgnoreCase = True
> >    Try TextHighlighter.Register("asm6502", "asm6502", "highlight/ 
> > asm6502.highlight")
> >    If Error Then
> >
> > .....
> >
> > On 7/14/25 11:54, Brian G wrote:
> > > All my keywords and test operators are caseless. I am trying to 
> > > define @word to redifine how a word should look as caseless
> > >
> > > I try this
> > >
> > > @word /(?i)[A-Za-z_](?i)[A-Za-z0-9_]*(?-i)/
> > >
> > > @word /(?i)[A-Za-z_][A-Za-z0-9_]*/
> > >
> > > I want this
> > >
> > > @word (?i)/[A-Za-z_](?i)[A-Za-z0-9_]*/ this cause the evaluation to 
> > > crash
> > >
> > > Help?? has anyone done work with this?
>
> It's a good idea to be able to have case unsensitivity in keywords, 
> but why did you make a bug report with the code instead of a merge 
> request???
I was not sure how you would feel about my approach/solution!

--
~~~~ Brian

Attachment: OpenPGP_0x78BFB26402F48419.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature