Re: [CONFIGURATION] missing openSUSE_Leap_15.6 for OBS

[Benoît Minisini <benoit.minisini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Le 03/12/2024 à 07:01, munix9 a écrit :
> Am 03.12.24 um 06:35 schrieb munix9:
> > The configuration for openSUSE_Leap_15.6 is still missing, although 
> > everything necessary is already available.
> >
> > There are probably two ways to implement this at the moment:
> >
> > 1. to implement it laboriously and elaborately in 'gambas-package- 
> > config', or
> > 2. use the flexibility of rpm-spec and get there faster.
> >
> > I am in favor of variant 2.
> >
> > What is necessary for this:
> > The template 'gambas3-openSUSE_Tumbleweed.spec' is already prepared 
> > for this, so what 'gambas-package-config' needs to do would be a
> > cp gambas3-openSUSE_Tumbleweed.spec gambas3-openSUSE_Leap_15.6.spec
> >
> > I would rename the file 'gambas3.rpmlintrc' or 'gambas3- 
> > openSUSE_Tumbleweed.rpmlintrc' to 'gambas3-openSUSE.rpmlintrc' and 
> > change it accordingly in the spec.
> >
> > This results in the directory .obs/
> > gambas3-openSUSE_Leap_15.6.spec
> > gambas3-openSUSE_Tumbleweed.spec
> > gambas3-openSUSE.rpmlintrc
>
>
> I just realized that although it is possible to flexibly configure areas 
> with rpm-spec depending on conditions (e.g. gb_mongodb, gb_qt5_webkit), 
> 'gambas-package-config' does not take this into account in the 
> '%files ...' sections.
>
> This is bad and rather inflexible - in my opinion, too much logic is 
> unnecessarily shifted to 'gambas-package-config'.

At the moment, I don't find there is too much logic, rather not enough. 
If we succeed in generating all the recipes correctly, the maintenance 
job of all these recipes will be far easier!

> There has to be a way to add corresponding '%files ...' sections within 
> the rpm-spec, similar to the packages, for example
>
> %if %{with gb_mongodb}
> @{files gb.mongodb
> }@
> %endif
>
> Or is this already possible?

No, but I can add it.

Regards,

--
Benoît Minisini.