[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Proposal for possible consolidation of the packages


On Sunday, November 24th, 2024 at 18:28, Benoît Minisini <benoit.minisini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Le 24/11/2024 à 18:19, munix9 a écrit :
>
> > Am 24.11.24 um 17:26 schrieb Benoît Minisini:
> >
> > > Le 24/11/2024 à 10:19, munix9 a écrit :
> > >
> > > Mmm... I don't see how it will simplify things. I think it's even the
> > > contrary.
> >
> > Oh, ok.
> >
> > > Don't forget that the IDE has a wizard that creates packages for your
> > > projects. If there isn't a bijection between packages and components,
> > > it will become a nightmare to implement.
> >
> > I don't understand: what does the ide have to do with it?
> >
> > An example: given is a package description that contains the following
> > package: myPack
> > package: myPack-aaa
> > package: myPack-bbb
> >
> > An alternative package description, on the other hand, contains
> > package: myPack
> > provides: myPack-aaa
> > provides: myPack-bbb

I have no idea how to do this for debian. 


> >
> > The first version results in 3 “real” package files, while the second
> > version results in only one package, which however technically
> > (virtually) indicates that it also contains the packages “myPack-aaa”
> > and “myPack-bbb”.
> >
> > The respective system management software can resolve this and a search
> > for “myPack-aaa” results in “myPack” in the second version.
> >
> > And so it is no problem if any other package, let's call it “something-
> > completely-different” contains the line
> >
> > requires: myPack-aaa (or depends, or ...)
> >
> > The respective system management software does not care whether the
> > package “myPack-aaa” really exists or is available as part of “myPack”.


Is this a feature on debian as well?

gbWilly


Follow-Ups:
Re: Proposal for possible consolidation of the packagesmunix9 <munix9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:
Proposal for possible consolidation of the packagesmunix9 <munix9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Proposal for possible consolidation of the packagesBenoît Minisini <benoit.minisini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Proposal for possible consolidation of the packagesmunix9 <munix9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Proposal for possible consolidation of the packagesBenoît Minisini <benoit.minisini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>