Re: Gambas 3.19.6 and 3.19.90 recipes

[gbWilly <gbWilly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> Le 15/11/2024 à 22:54, gbWilly a écrit :
> 
> > ...
> 
> 
> Please send the answer to the mailing-list only, not me.

My mistake and not intentional. If I hit 'reply' accidentally the answer only goes to the sender, not the list.
I have to do a 'reply all' for it to go to mailing list but I sometimes forget.


> 
> They are. 'gb.jit' and 'gb.hash' are part of the gambas3-runtime
> package. These two components do not have packages on their own (it's
> unneeded as they are no dependencies except the interpreter).

OK, I kind a thought so, but the table telling what packages are needed is misleading.
Official debian makes both gb.hash and gb.jit packages, but I took Gambas ppa as a guide for my recipes.

> 
> I have updated the wiki, as 'gb.jit' was not listed.

OK

> 
> 
> > That is why I have kept the older recipes on my gitlab, as there is no
> > way to know what packages exactly to make for these older version, when
> > checking the wiki.
> 
> 
> You must take the specification files from the packages of the Gambas PPAs.

I already have recipes for older versions that I collected on my harddisk, I kept track of what was going on on Gambas ppa.
Only, I can not access the files on launchpad anymore as I wanted to check teh last recipe of a master build. It says I need to make an account. That's new.

Iḿ not a fan of having accounts everywhere, especially not with canonical. I left Ubuntu for a reason and that being they are becoming more like M$.
I do not like the direction they are developing in. So I guess I was lucky that I saved all these recipes in the past and still had a master recipe from October 12 or 13 to compare.

gbWilly