[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gambas residual gumph
[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: gambas residual gumph
- From: Bruce Steers <bsteers4@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 13:40:25 +0000
- To: user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 at 10:15, Benoît Minisini < benoit.minisini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Le 08/11/2024 à 02:43, Bruce Steers a écrit : > > > > but that is just for running programs the JIT folders should be kept yes? > > because the folder names are proc IDs of the parent program then if a > > program is restarted it gets a new ID and the old JIT folders are > > invalid so it'll recompile anyway in a new folder matching the ID of the > > program. > > No, there is no process id in the '/run/...' JIT folder, only user id. > It's a cache by user. > > -- > Benoît Minisini. > i /run/user/1000/gambas/ there are 2 folders one called 2715 and one called 4275 that is not user ID
Re: gambas residual gumph | Bruce Steers <bsteers4@xxxxxxxxx> |
gambas residual gumph | Bruce Steers <bsteers4@xxxxxxxxx> |
Re: gambas residual gumph | Bruce Steers <bsteers4@xxxxxxxxx> |
Re: gambas residual gumph | Bruce Steers <bsteers4@xxxxxxxxx> |
Re: gambas residual gumph | Benoît Minisini <benoit.minisini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Re: gambas residual gumph | Bruce Steers <bsteers4@xxxxxxxxx> |
Re: gambas residual gumph | Benoît Minisini <benoit.minisini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |