[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: gambas residual gumph


On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 at 10:15, Benoît Minisini <
benoit.minisini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Le 08/11/2024 à 02:43, Bruce Steers a écrit :
> >
> > but that is just for running programs the JIT folders should be kept yes?
> > because the folder names are proc IDs of the parent program then if a
> > program is restarted it gets a new ID and the old JIT folders are
> > invalid so it'll recompile anyway in a new folder matching the ID of the
> > program.
>
> No, there is no process id in the '/run/...' JIT folder, only user id.
> It's a cache by user.
>
> --
> Benoît Minisini.
>

i /run/user/1000/gambas/ there are 2 folders one called 2715 and one called
4275
that is not user ID

Follow-Ups:
Re: gambas residual gumphBruce Steers <bsteers4@xxxxxxxxx>
References:
gambas residual gumphBruce Steers <bsteers4@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: gambas residual gumphBruce Steers <bsteers4@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: gambas residual gumphBruce Steers <bsteers4@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: gambas residual gumphBenoît Minisini <benoit.minisini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: gambas residual gumphBruce Steers <bsteers4@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: gambas residual gumphBenoît Minisini <benoit.minisini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>