[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gambas-bugtracker] Bug #3089: 3.21.0 destroys my own CopyModel() method.
[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next]
- Subject: [Gambas-bugtracker] Bug #3089: 3.21.0 destroys my own CopyModel() method.
- From: <bugtracker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2025 14:53:05 GMT
- To: bsteers@xxxxxxxxx,chrisml@xxxxxxxxxxx,bugtracker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://gambaswiki.org/bugtracker/edit?object=BUG.3089&from=L21haW4- Comment #10 by Christof THALHOFER: Yes it destroys compatibility. My "fix" for my software is, that I add an unique (uuid) prefix to each string which originates from a Gambas date before it is stored in JSON. After decoding my software afterwards looks if a string starts with that uuid, removes it, and stores the string in a Gambas date variable. The advantage is that old date strings stored in JSON with previous versions of Gambas are still recognized as date. My software stores only new ones in this way. My software does not interoperate with JS. The best "fix" would be if Gambas 3.21 would be able to detect the JS date as such and store it in a Gambas date variable. ----[ Gambas bugtracker-list is hosted by https://www.hostsharing.net ]----
| [Gambas-bugtracker] Bug #3089: 3.21.0 destroys my own CopyModel() method. | <bugtracker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |