[Gambas-user] updated benchmark

Brian G brian at westwoodsvcs.com
Wed Sep 28 06:01:48 CEST 2022

Why use C when gambas will do just fine.
Unsafe is only a concept, well written code is safe.
Brian G Tuesday, 27 September 2022, 03:51PM -07:00 from Jussi Lahtinen  jussi.lahtinen at gmail.com :

>Probably no particular reason, other than it is generally wise to avoid "unsafe".
>In my opinion, if you want to get closer to the "C territory" because of speed, then you could as well use C.
>On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 1:12 AM Brian G < brian at westwoodsvcs.com> wrote:
>>By adding fast unsafe to the start of primes.gbs the speed is orders of magnitude faster.
>>Is there a reason not to do this for the benchmarks?
>>1.5 seconds gbs 
>>5.7 seconds without fast unsafe gbs
>>16.217seconds for py
>>"Failure is the key to success; 
>> each mistake teaches us something"  .. Morihei Ueshiba
>>Brian G
>>----[  http://gambaswiki.org/wiki/doc/netiquette ]----
>----[  http://gambaswiki.org/wiki/doc/netiquette ]----
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gambas-basic.org/pipermail/user/attachments/20220928/a9586beb/attachment.htm>

More information about the User mailing list