[Gambas-devel] Just a wild thought
sourceforge-raindog2 at ...19...
Fri Apr 3 20:50:58 CEST 2009
On Friday 03 April 2009 14:16, ottod wrote:
> Many people reject the
> idea of desktop apps, saying web apps is the way to go, but that at
> least is contradictory, as the browser itself is a desktop app.
The browser is more than a desktop app; I can write a web app in any one of
dozens of server languages, including Gambas (though on the browser side I
on a desktop, an ARM-based $150 netbook, an iPhone and a Wii, and if I'm
careful, my 5-year-old freebie cell phone as well. There is no other
development language or framework for which that's true. Except for
hardware-intensive programs like DVD burners and higher-end games, and
despite repeated attempts by Microsoft such as VBscript, ActiveX and
Silverlight to make web apps require one particular operating system, I
think that a majority of development will be web development in the next 5
years -- if it's not true already.
> keyboard): can the Gambas compiler and interpreter be ported to Java
> instead of C and plug to Java components instead of OS/library
> components? "CAN" being asked in the sense of a practical time frame and
Richard Stallman made the same suggestion a few years ago. I disagreed
with him then and I still do. I can't speak for Benoit, but I think it
would be a redundant effort considering how many BASIC dialects for the
Java virtual machine there already are:
Personally, Gambas' object model and component design philosophy (expose
all you can but don't make it feel like a C API, basically) is more
appealing to me than its syntax, which is kind of verbose for me as a Perl
programmer but just right for a newbie. Just as when Microsoft terminated
Visual Basic and created VB.NET as a vaguely similar but fundamentally
different language, the resulting language wouldn't be Gambas anymore, but
just another BASIC-like syntax overlay for Java.
More information about the Devel